Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition Convertible F82 and SQ5 Sportback are neck and neck (4,42 s vs 4,43 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition Convertible F82 | SQ5 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s | 4,42 s+0,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,51 s−0,25 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,55 s−0,95 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,98 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition Convertible F82 | SQ5 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,16 s | 1,06 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,94 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,25 s | 3,15 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,43 s | 4,42 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,80 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,41 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,54 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,51 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,55 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 790 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.43 s for the M4 Competition Convertible. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the M4 Competition Convertible is doing 148 km/h against 142 km/h for the SQ5 Sportback. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the M4 Competition Convertible crosses the line in 12.51 s versus 12.76 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the M4 Competition Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M4 Competition Convertible finishes in 22.55 s versus 23.50 s, with a 0.95 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the M4 Competition Convertible and the SQ5 Sportback are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.98 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.96 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition Convertible F82 and SQ5 Sportback are neck and neck (4,42 s vs 4,43 s, no significant gap).
M4 Competition Convertible F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,43 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Competition Convertible F82: 450 hp, ratio 3,98 kg/hp. SQ5 Sportback: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
M4 Competition Convertible F82: 250 km/h. SQ5 Sportback: 250 km/h.