Over 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 wins (3,03 s vs 5,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 CS F90 | Cayman (Manual) 987 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,03 s−2,62 s | 5,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,82 s−2,97 s | 13,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,94 s−4,75 s | 24,69 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 295 km/h+28 km/h | 267 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,87 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 CS F90 | Cayman (Manual) 987 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,91 s | 1,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,51 s | 2,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,33 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,03 s | 5,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,74 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,21 s | 12,00 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,97 s | 19,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,82 s | 13,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,94 s | 24,69 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h | 267 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 825 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 330 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 CS hits 100 km/h in 3.03 s versus 5.65 s for the Cayman (Manual). At this point, the Bmw M5 CS leads by 2.62 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 CS is doing 170 km/h against 135 km/h for the Cayman (Manual). The gap is 2.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 CS crosses the line in 10.81 s versus 13.79 s. The 2.97 s gap represents roughly 133 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 CS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 CS finishes in 19.94 s versus 24.69 s, with a 4.75 s lead.
The Bmw M5 CS features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Cayman (Manual)’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 305 km/h, the Bmw M5 CS never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.87 kg/hp vs 4.94 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.61 seconds. The 2.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 wins (3,03 s vs 5,65 s).
M5 CS F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 CS F90: 635 hp, ratio 2,87 kg/hp. Cayman (Manual) 987: 269 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp.
M5 CS F90: 295 km/h. Cayman (Manual) 987: 267 km/h.