Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 M40d G01 gagne (4,87 s vs 6,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40d G01 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s−1,84 s | 6,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,21 s−1,72 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,25 s−2,85 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+30 km/h | 220 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40d G01 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,25 s | 1,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,01 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,49 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s | 6,71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,61 s | 8,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,49 s | 15,83 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,48 s | 30,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,21 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,25 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 043 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 10-speed torque-converter automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw X3 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.87 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. At this point, the Bmw X3 M40d leads by 1.84 s and sits roughly 21 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d is doing 138 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 1.28 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X3 M40d crosses the line in 13.21 s versus 14.92 s. The 1.71 s gap represents roughly 72 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 M40d finishes in 24.24 s versus 27.09 s, with a 2.85 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X3 M40d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.81 kg/hp vs 6.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 1.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X3 M40d G01 gagne (4,87 s vs 6,71 s).
X3 M40d G01 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,87 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X3 M40d G01 : 326 hp, ratio 5,81 kg/hp. Explorer EcoBoost 300 : 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp.
X3 M40d G01 : 250 km/h. Explorer EcoBoost 300 : 220 km/h.