Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 5,39 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40i G01 | Terramar VZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s−0,65 s | 5,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s−0,73 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s−1,10 s | 24,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 261 km/h−11 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,19 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,57 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40i G01 | Terramar VZ |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,70 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,08 s | 2,50 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,49 s | 4,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,74 s | 5,39 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,59 s | 12,09 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,32 s | 19,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,98 s | 13,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s | 24,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 261 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 870 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 670 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Bmw X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.74 s versus 5.39 s for the Terramar VZ. At this point, the Bmw X3 M40i leads by 0.65 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 138 km/h for the Terramar VZ. The gap is 0.56 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X3 M40i crosses the line in 12.98 s versus 13.70 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 M40i finishes in 23.62 s versus 24.72 s, with a 1.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 261 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X3 M40i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.19 kg/hp vs 5.57 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.18 seconds. The 0.65 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,74 s vs 5,39 s).
X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,74 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. Terramar VZ: 300 hp, ratio 5,57 kg/hp.
X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. Terramar VZ: 261 km/h.