Sur 0–100 km/h, Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD gagne (6,09 s vs 6,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD | X3 xDrive30e G01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,09 s−0,05 s | 6,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,32 s−0,06 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,94 s−0,34 s | 26,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+30 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,10 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,82 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD | X3 xDrive30e G01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,63 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,78 s | 2,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,52 s | 4,34 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,09 s | 6,14 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,16 s | 8,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,94 s | 14,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 24,26 s | 25,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,32 s | 14,38 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,94 s | 26,28 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 860 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 990 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD hits 100 km/h in 6.09 s versus 6.14 s for the Bmw X3 xDrive30e. The 0.05 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30e is doing 127 km/h against 131 km/h for the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD crosses the line in 14.32 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.06 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 181 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD finishes in 25.93 s versus 26.28 s, with a 0.35 s lead.
Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw X3 xDrive30e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.10 kg/hp vs 6.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.78 seconds. The 0.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD gagne (6,09 s vs 6,14 s).
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,09 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD : 305 hp, ratio 6,10 kg/hp. X3 xDrive30e G01 : 292 hp, ratio 6,82 kg/hp.
Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWD : 240 km/h. X3 xDrive30e G01 : 210 km/h.