Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 9,49 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 xDrive30i G01 | X2 sDrive18i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s−3,14 s | 9,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s−2,31 s | 16,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s−4,48 s | 31,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+38 km/h | 202 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,37 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 xDrive30i G01 | X2 sDrive18i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,50 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,54 s | 3,25 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,56 s | 6,49 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,35 s | 9,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,65 s | 13,54 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,25 s | 26,84 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,16 s | 89,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,57 s | 16,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s | 31,04 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 410 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the X3 xDrive30i hits 100 km/h in 6.35 s versus 9.49 s for the X2 sDrive18i. At this point, the X3 xDrive30i leads by 3.14 s and sits roughly 21 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X3 xDrive30i is doing 126 km/h against 108 km/h for the X2 sDrive18i. The gap is 1.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 xDrive30i crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 16.88 s. The 2.32 s gap represents roughly 83 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X3 xDrive30i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 149 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 xDrive30i finishes in 26.56 s versus 31.04 s, with a 4.48 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X3 xDrive30i is capped at 240 km/h, the X2 sDrive18i at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 10.37 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.03 seconds. The 3.14 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 xDrive30i G01 wins (6,35 s vs 9,49 s).
X3 xDrive30i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 xDrive30i G01: 252 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. X2 sDrive18i F39: 136 hp, ratio 10,37 kg/hp.
X3 xDrive30i G01: 240 km/h. X2 sDrive18i F39: 202 km/h.