Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M Competition G02 gagne (4,13 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M Competition G02 | X6 xDrive40d G06 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,13 s−1,46 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,22 s−1,69 s | 13,91 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,35 s−3,14 s | 25,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+2 km/h | 248 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M Competition G02 | X6 xDrive40d G06 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,07 s | 1,35 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,96 s | 3,95 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,13 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,38 s | 7,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,98 s | 13,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,46 s | 23,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,22 s | 13,91 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,35 s | 25,49 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 248 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 995 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 215 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 4.13 s versus 5.59 s for the Bmw X6 xDrive40d. At this point, the Bmw X4 M Competition leads by 1.46 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition is doing 151 km/h against 131 km/h for the Bmw X6 xDrive40d. The gap is 1.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M Competition crosses the line in 12.22 s versus 13.91 s. The 1.69 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 207 km/h versus 182 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M Competition finishes in 22.35 s versus 25.48 s, with a 3.14 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 248 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X4 M Competition and the Bmw X6 xDrive40d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 6.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.87 seconds. The 1.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M Competition G02 gagne (4,13 s vs 5,58 s).
X4 M Competition G02 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,13 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X4 M Competition G02 : 510 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. X6 xDrive40d G06 : 340 hp, ratio 6,51 kg/hp.
X4 M Competition G02 : 250 km/h. X6 xDrive40d G06 : 248 km/h.