G02 · GENERATION 2021 · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE

X4 M Competition

510 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 M Competition ranks 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 7th of 12 in Top speed, 3rd of 12 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,30315,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

510hp

600 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.1s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.9L

/100 km

Tank

65L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X4 M Competition

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm³
Power510 hp
Couple600 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.9 L/100km
Tank65 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,1 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,758 mm
Wheelbase2,864 mm
Width1,927 mm
Height1,620 mm
Boot525 L
Kerb weight1,995 kg
Cd0.36
CO₂ WLTP251 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 D-SUV, the X4 M Competition ranks (top 2 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 3rd of 12 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t). 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 3rd of 12 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X4 M Competition ranks 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (7th of 12 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X4 M Competition stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h2e / 12
4,1 s
Min 5,2 s · Porsche Macan SMax 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Top speed7e / 12
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw X4 M40iMax 285 km/h · Jaguar F-PACE SVR
Power-to-weight3e / 12
256 hp/t
Min 168 hp/t · Bmw X3 M40dMax 272 hp/t · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X4 G02 range

Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G02

Compare

Popular duels involving the X4 M Competition

Frequently asked questions

BMW X4 M Competition: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 12 D-SUV 2019–2023, the X4 M Competition ranks 2nd of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 7th of 12 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 3rd of 12 in Power-to-weight (256 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X3 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 M Competition vs Bmw X3 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.