Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 4,93 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M Competition G05 | Q8 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−1,10 s | 4,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s−1,24 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s−2,17 s | 23,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M Competition G05 | Q8 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,73 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,90 s | 3,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 4,93 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,02 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,23 s | 11,10 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,32 s | 18,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s | 23,97 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 335 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X5 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 4.93 s for the Q8 SUV. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw X5 M Competition leads by 1.10 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition is doing 155 km/h against 140 km/h for the Q8 SUV. The gap is 0.83 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 M Competition crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 13.18 s. The 1.24 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 195 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition finishes in 21.80 s versus 23.96 s, with a 2.17 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X5 M Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q8 SUV at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.54 seconds. The 1.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 4,93 s).
X5 M Competition G05 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M Competition G05: 625 hp, ratio 3,74 kg/hp. Q8 SUV: 489 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp.
X5 M Competition G05: 250 km/h. Q8 SUV: 240 km/h.