Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 7,24 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | X5 M Competition G05 | i3 I01 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.83 s | 7.24 s | 3.41 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| 400 m standing start | 11.95 s | 15.40 s | 3.45 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.80 s | 29.80 s | 8.00 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 150 km/h | 100 km/h · X5 M Competition G05 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.74 kg/hp | 7.47 kg/hp | better ratio · X5 M Competition G05 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | X5 M Competition G05 | i3 I01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.06 s | 1.88 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.73 s | 3.14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.90 s | 5.25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.83 s | 7.24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.02 s | 9.85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8.23 s | - |
| 0–200 km/h | 13.32 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11.95 s | 15.40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.80 s | 29.80 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 150 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 335 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 270 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic, single-speed with fixed ratio (9.665:1) |
Off the line, the X5 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 7.24 s for the i3. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X5 M Competition leads by 3.41 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X5 M Competition is doing 155 km/h against 122 km/h for the i3. The gap is 2.33 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X5 M Competition crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 15.40 s. The 3.46 s gap represents roughly 136 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X5 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X5 M Competition finishes in 21.80 s versus 29.80 s, with a 8.00 s lead.
The X5 M Competition features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the i3’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X5 M Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the i3 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.47 seconds. The 3.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 7,24 s).
X5 M Competition G05 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M Competition G05: 625 hp, ratio 3,74 kg/hp. i3 I01: 170 hp, ratio 7,47 kg/hp.
X5 M Competition G05: 250 km/h. i3 I01: 150 km/h.