Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 and G6 are neck and neck (3,80 s vs 3,83 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M Competition G05 | G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,80 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s−0,08 s | 12,03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s−1,09 s | 22,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+50 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,41 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M Competition G05 | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,73 s | 1,76 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,86 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,80 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,02 s | 5,01 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,23 s | 8,63 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,32 s | 13,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,95 s | 12,03 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,80 s | 22,89 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 335 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the G6 hits 100 km/h in 3.80 s versus 3.83 s for the Bmw X5 M Competition. The instant torque of 660 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition is doing 155 km/h against 152 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.01 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 M Competition crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 12.03 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 200 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 M Competition finishes in 21.80 s versus 22.89 s, with a 1.09 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X5 M Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the G6 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.75 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 and G6 are neck and neck (3,80 s vs 3,83 s, no significant gap).
X5 M Competition G05 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M Competition G05: 625 hp, ratio 3,74 kg/hp. G6: 480 hp, ratio 4,41 kg/hp.
X5 M Competition G05: 250 km/h. G6: 200 km/h.