Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M50d F15 | SQ5 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 4,42 s+0,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 12,76 s+0,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 23,50 s+1,11 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,69 kg/hp | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M50d F15 | SQ5 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,71 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,95 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,34 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. At this point, the SQ5 Sportback leads by 0.73 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 Sportback is doing 142 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw X5 M50d. The gap is 0.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 Sportback crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 13.47 s. The 0.71 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 Sportback finishes in 23.50 s versus 24.60 s, with a 1.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X5 M50d and the SQ5 Sportback are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.69 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 0.73 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 5,15 s).
X5 M50d F15 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,15 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X5 M50d F15 : 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp. SQ5 Sportback : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
X5 M50d F15 : 250 km/h. SQ5 Sportback : 250 km/h.