Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 wins (5,15 s vs 6,56 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M50d F15 | Cooper S FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s−1,41 s | 6,56 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−1,15 s | 14,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s−1,42 s | 26,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,86 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M50d F15 | Cooper S FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,88 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 3,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,71 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 6,56 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,95 s | 8,41 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 13,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,34 s | 22,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 14,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 26,03 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 195 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
Off the line, the X5 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.15 s versus 6.56 s for the Cooper S FWD. At this point, the X5 M50d leads by 1.41 s and sits roughly 21 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X5 M50d is doing 136 km/h against 132 km/h for the Cooper S FWD. The gap is 1.02 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X5 M50d crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 14.62 s. The 1.15 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X5 M50d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 189 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X5 M50d finishes in 24.60 s versus 26.02 s, with a 1.42 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
The X5 M50d features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Cooper S FWD’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the X5 M50d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.69 kg/hp vs 5.86 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.51 seconds. The 1.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 wins (5,15 s vs 6,56 s).
X5 M50d F15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp. Cooper S FWD: 204 hp, ratio 5,86 kg/hp.
X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h. Cooper S FWD: 250 km/h.