2024 · GENERATION 2024 · CITY CAR
MINIICE

Cooper S FWD

204 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper S FWD ranks 20th of 20 in Combined consumption, 12th of 16 in Tank range, 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,00015,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

204hp

300 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.5s

VMax 245 km/h

Cons.

6.6L

/100 km

Tank

44L

Technical identity card

Full specifications MINI Cooper S FWD

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Power204 hp
Couple300 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6.6 L/100km
Tank44 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,5 s
VMax245 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width1,728 mm
Height1,432 mm
Kerb weight1,195 kg
Cd0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 city cars, the Cooper S FWD ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

city car among the best in segment: 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (20th of 20 in Combined consumption)

The Cooper S FWD consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).

Tank range: 667 km (12th of 16 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Cooper S FWD covers 667 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Cooper S FWD stands against city cars

Comparison across 22 city cars marketed between 2022–2026.

Combined consumption20e / 20
6.6 L/100
Min 6.6 L/100 · MINI Cooper S FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
Tank range12e / 16
667 km
Min 645 km · Audi A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kWMax 909 km · Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G
0–100 km/h2e / 22
6,5 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,3 s · Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full MINI Cooper S range

Other versions

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cooper S FWD

Frequently asked questions

MINI Cooper S FWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper S FWD ranks 20th of 20 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 12th of 16 in Tank range (667 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).

667 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 12th of 16 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cooper S FWD vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.