MINI Cooper S FWD
204 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper S FWD ranks 20th of 20 in Combined consumption, 12th of 16 in Tank range, 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 204 hp
- 300 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.5 s
- VMax 245 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 44 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Power
- 204 hp
- Couple
- 300 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 44 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,5 s
- VMax
- 245 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Width
- 1,728 mm
- Height
- 1,432 mm
- Kerb weight
- 1,195 kg
- Cd
- 0.32
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 city cars, the Cooper S FWD ranks (last in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
city car among the best in segment: 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G (1st with 909 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (20th of 20 in Combined consumption)
The Cooper S FWD consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 667 km (12th of 16 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cooper S FWD covers 667 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 909 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Cooper S FWD stands against city cars
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full MINI Cooper S range
Other versions
Popular duels involving the Cooper S FWD
Continue with the MINI Cooper S FWD
The same car, from other angles.
MINI Cooper S FWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Cooper S FWD rank in its segment?
Among the 22 city cars 2022–2026, the Cooper S FWD ranks 20th of 20 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 12th of 16 in Tank range (667 km, behind the Dacia Sandero TCe 100 ECO-G), 2nd of 22 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris Morizo Edition).
What is the range of the Cooper S FWD?
667 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 12th of 16 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Cooper S FWD cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG instead?
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cooper S FWD vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.