Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 wins (5,15 s vs 5,77 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M50d F15 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s−0,62 s | 5,77 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−0,54 s | 14,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s−1,04 s | 25,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+7 km/h | 243 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,22 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M50d F15 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 2,21 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,71 s | 4,08 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 5,77 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,95 s | 7,83 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 13,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,34 s | 24,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 14,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 25,65 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 243 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Bmw X5 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.15 s versus 5.77 s for the Cayenne Coupe. At this point, the Bmw X5 M50d leads by 0.62 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d is doing 136 km/h against 131 km/h for the Cayenne Coupe. The gap is 0.33 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 M50d crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 14.00 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 24 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 189 km/h versus 182 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d finishes in 24.60 s versus 25.64 s, with a 1.04 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 243 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X5 M50d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne Coupe at 243 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.69 kg/hp vs 6.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.00 seconds. The 0.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 wins (5,15 s vs 5,77 s).
X5 M50d F15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp. Cayenne Coupe E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp.
X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h. Cayenne Coupe E3.1: 243 km/h.