Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S 958.2 gagne (5,13 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne S 958.2 | X5 M50d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s−0,03 s | 5,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,45 s−0,02 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,50 s−0,11 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h+1 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,96 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne S 958.2 | X5 M50d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,15 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,81 s | 3,71 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s | 5,15 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,09 s | 6,95 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,79 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,60 s | 20,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,45 s | 13,47 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,50 s | 24,61 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 251 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 085 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Cayenne S hits 100 km/h in 5.13 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d is doing 136 km/h against 137 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 0.01 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne S crosses the line in 13.45 s versus 13.47 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.11 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne S is capped at 257 km/h, the Bmw X5 M50d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.96 kg/hp vs 5.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.11 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S 958.2 gagne (5,13 s vs 5,15 s).
Cayenne S 958.2 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,13 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne S 958.2 : 420 hp, ratio 4,96 kg/hp. X5 M50d F15 : 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp.
Cayenne S 958.2 : 251 km/h. X5 M50d F15 : 250 km/h.