Among the 12 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne S ranks 8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (5.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 10th of 12 in Top speed (257 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 10th of 12 in Power-to-weight (201 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).
958.2 · GENERATION 2015 → · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE
Cayenne S
420 hp, 5,2 s 0-100 : among the 12 E-SUV 2013–2017, the Cayenne S ranks 8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 12 in Top speed, 10th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
420hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.2s
VMax 257 km/h
Cons.
9.9L
/100 km
Tank
26.4L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 3,598 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 426 hp |
| Combined power | 420 hp |
| Combined torque | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 26.4 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,2 s |
| VMax | 257 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,854 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,896 mm |
| Width | 1,999 mm |
| Height | 1,712 mm |
| Boot | 24 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,085 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 E-SUV, the Cayenne S ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.2 s 0-100 (8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne S ranks 8th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 1.3 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (3.9 s).
Top speed: 257 km/h (10th of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 257 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne S stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 12 E-SUV marketed between 2013–2017.
0–100 km/h8e / 12
5,2 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 3,9 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Top speed10e / 12
257 km/h
Min 229 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 283 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Power-to-weight10e / 12
201 hp/t
Min 150 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 263 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q8 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayenne 958.2 range
Generation 958.2 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 958.2
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne S
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s vs 5.2 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne S vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.