Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 gagne (5,29 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50d F16 | X5 xDrive40d G05 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s−0,29 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s−0,29 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s−0,63 s | 25,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+5 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,73 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,47 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50d F16 | X5 xDrive40d G05 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,35 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,20 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,96 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,14 s | 7,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,41 s | 13,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,42 s | 23,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 25,54 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw X6 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.29 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw X5 xDrive40d. The 0.29 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d is doing 135 km/h against 131 km/h for the Bmw X5 xDrive40d. The gap is 0.14 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X6 M50d crosses the line in 13.62 s versus 13.92 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 187 km/h versus 181 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d finishes in 24.91 s versus 25.54 s, with a 0.63 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X6 M50d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.73 kg/hp vs 6.47 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.87 seconds. The 0.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 gagne (5,29 s vs 5,58 s).
X6 M50d F16 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X6 M50d F16 : 381 hp, ratio 5,73 kg/hp. X5 xDrive40d G05 : 340 hp, ratio 6,47 kg/hp.
X6 M50d F16 : 250 km/h. X5 xDrive40d G05 : 245 km/h.