Over 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 wins (6,78 s vs 6,94 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X7 xDrive30d G07 | X1 xDrive25e F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,94 s | 6,78 s+0,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,05 s | 14,92 s+0,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,90 s | 27,44 s+0,46 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 227 km/h+34 km/h | 193 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,94 kg/hp | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X7 xDrive30d G07 | X1 xDrive25e F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,44 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,28 s | 2,46 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,65 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,94 s | 6,78 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,88 s | 9,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,62 s | 17,26 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 36,01 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,05 s | 14,92 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,90 s | 27,44 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h | 193 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X1 xDrive25e hits 100 km/h in 6.78 s versus 6.94 s for the X7 xDrive30d. The instant torque of 385 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the X7 xDrive30d is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the X7 xDrive30d is doing 119 km/h against 122 km/h for the X1 xDrive25e. The gap is 0.01 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X1 xDrive25e crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.04 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the X1 xDrive25e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 168 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X1 xDrive25e finishes in 27.44 s versus 27.89 s, with a 0.46 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (227 km/h), the X7 xDrive30d never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X7 xDrive30d is capped at 227 km/h, the X1 xDrive25e at 193 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.64 seconds. The 0.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X1 xDrive25e F48 wins (6,78 s vs 6,94 s).
X7 xDrive30d G07 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X7 xDrive30d G07: 265 hp, ratio 8,94 kg/hp. X1 xDrive25e F48: 220 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp.
X7 xDrive30d G07: 227 km/h. X1 xDrive25e F48: 193 km/h.