F48 · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT SUV
BMWPHEV

X1 xDrive25e

220 hp, 54 km electric range, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X1 xDrive25e ranks 7th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, 8th of 9 in Combined range, 8th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated, 6th of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power

220hp

385 Nm · 95 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

6.9s

VMax 193 km/h

Total range

589km

of which 54 km elec

Battery + Tank

8.8kWh

+ 36 L tank

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X1 xDrive25e

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture3 cyl.
Displacement1,499 cm³
Puissance électrique95 hp
Combined power220 hp
Couple385 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 6 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity8.8 kWh
Range WLTP54 km
Conso élec WLTP100.0 kWh/100km
Petrol cons. WLTP2.1 L/100km
Conso thermique6.7 L/100km
Tank36 L
EV range motorway7 km
Total range motorway589 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,9 s
VMax193 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,447 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,821 mm
Height1,582 mm
Boot450 L
Kerb weight1,745 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP48 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid, the X1 xDrive25e combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (in the bottom third), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the X1 xDrive25e through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

In the city: 54 km pure electric (in the bottom third)

With a full battery, the X1 xDrive25e drives in pure electric mode for the first 54 km WLTP — placing it 7th of 9 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the X1 xDrive25e behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.

Segment positioning

Where the X1 xDrive25e stands against C-SUV plug-in hybrid

Comparison across 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.

Electric WLTP range7e / 9
54 km
Min 49 km · Bmw X1 xDrive25eMax 75 km · Toyota RAV4 PHEV
Combined range8e / 9
589 km
Min 59 km · Opel Grandland Plug-in Hybrid 300 AWDMax 1 013 km · Ford Kuga PHEV 225
Thermal cons. estimated8e / 9
6.73 L/100
Min 7.56 L/100 · Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEVMax 4.7 L/100 · Ford Kuga PHEV 225
0–100 km/h6e / 9
6,9 s
Min 9,2 s · Ford Kuga PHEV 225Max 6,0 s · Toyota RAV4 PHEV

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X1 F48 range

Generation F48 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F48

Compare

Popular duels involving the X1 xDrive25e

Frequently asked questions

BMW X1 xDrive25e: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 9 C-SUV plug-in hybrid 2018–2022, the X1 xDrive25e ranks 7th of 9 in Electric WLTP range (54 km, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV), 8th of 9 in Combined range (589 km, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 8th of 9 in Thermal cons. estimated (6.7 L/100, behind the Ford Kuga PHEV 225), 6th of 9 in 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the Toyota RAV4 PHEV).

54 km WLTP announced — making it the 7th of 9 in autonomie du segment out of 9 models. The reference is the Toyota RAV4 PHEV (75 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Toyota RAV4 PHEV leads in Electric WLTP range (75 km vs 54 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X1 xDrive25e vs Toyota RAV4 PHEV duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.