Over 0–100 km/h, X7 xDrive40d G07 wins (6,12 s vs 6,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X7 xDrive40d G07 | X2 xDrive25e F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s−0,80 s | 6,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,40 s−0,65 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,46 s−1,20 s | 27,66 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+50 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,86 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X7 xDrive40d G07 | X2 xDrive25e F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,47 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,25 s | 2,52 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,26 s | 4,81 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,49 s | 9,66 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,31 s | 17,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,30 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,40 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,46 s | 27,66 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X7 xDrive40d hits 100 km/h in 6.12 s versus 6.92 s for the X2 xDrive25e. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X7 xDrive40d leads by 0.80 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X7 xDrive40d is doing 126 km/h against 121 km/h for the X2 xDrive25e. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X7 xDrive40d crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 15.05 s. The 0.66 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the X7 xDrive40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X7 xDrive40d finishes in 26.45 s versus 27.66 s, with a 1.21 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X7 xDrive40d is capped at 245 km/h, the X2 xDrive25e at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.30 seconds. The 0.80 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X7 xDrive40d G07 wins (6,12 s vs 6,92 s).
X7 xDrive40d G07 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X7 xDrive40d G07: 340 hp, ratio 7,26 kg/hp. X2 xDrive25e F39: 220 hp, ratio 7,86 kg/hp.
X7 xDrive40d G07: 245 km/h. X2 xDrive25e F39: 195 km/h.