Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 gagne (4,37 s vs 5,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XM 50e G09 | Cayenne GTS E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,19 s | 4,37 s+0,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,44 s | 12,66 s+0,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,30 s | 23,38 s+0,92 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 266 km/h−16 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,50 kg/hp | 4,88 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XM 50e G09 | Cayenne GTS E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,39 s | 0,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 1,57 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,82 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,19 s | 4,37 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,88 s | 5,94 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,59 s | 10,45 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,84 s | 17,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,44 s | 12,66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,30 s | 23,38 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 266 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 247 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Cayenne GTS hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 5.19 s for the Bmw XM 50e. Despite lacking instant torque, 460 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Cayenne GTS leads by 0.82 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne GTS is doing 142 km/h against 139 km/h for the Bmw XM 50e. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne GTS crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 13.44 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 37 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne GTS finishes in 23.37 s versus 24.30 s, with a 0.93 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw XM 50e is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne GTS at 270 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 0.82 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 gagne (4,37 s vs 5,19 s).
XM 50e G09 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,19 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XM 50e G09 : 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp. Cayenne GTS E3.1 : 460 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp.
XM 50e G09 : 250 km/h. Cayenne GTS E3.1 : 266 km/h.