Sur 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR gagne (4,35 s vs 5,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | XM 50e G09 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s−0,84 s | 5,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−1,14 s | 13,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s−2,24 s | 24,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+35 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,50 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | XM 50e G09 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,39 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 2,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 3,82 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 5,19 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 6,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 11,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 18,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 13,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 24,30 s |
| Top speed limited | 285 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-PACE SVR 2021 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the F-PACE SVR hits 100 km/h in 4.35 s versus 5.19 s for the Bmw XM 50e. Despite lacking instant torque, 550 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-PACE SVR leads by 0.84 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE SVR is doing 154 km/h against 139 km/h for the Bmw XM 50e. The gap is 0.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE SVR crosses the line in 12.30 s versus 13.44 s. The 1.14 s gap represents roughly 53 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE SVR continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE SVR finishes in 22.05 s versus 24.30 s, with a 2.24 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-PACE SVR is capped at 285 km/h, the Bmw XM 50e at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.89 seconds. The 0.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR gagne (4,35 s vs 5,19 s).
F-PACE SVR passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-PACE SVR : 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. XM 50e G09 : 476 hp, ratio 5,50 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR : 285 km/h. XM 50e G09 : 250 km/h.