Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayman GT4 981 gagne (3,95 s vs 5,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayman GT4 981 | Z4 sDrive30i G29 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,95 s−1,40 s | 5,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,90 s−1,70 s | 13,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,60 s−3,00 s | 24,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 295 km/h+45 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,48 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,48 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayman GT4 981 | Z4 sDrive30i G29 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,98 s | 1,44 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,63 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,98 s | 3,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,95 s | 5,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,99 s | 7,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,18 s | 11,95 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,74 s | 19,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,90 s | 13,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,60 s | 24,60 s |
| Top speed limited | 295 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 419 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 340 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Z4 sDrive30i | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Cayman GT4 hits 100 km/h in 3.95 s versus 5.35 s for the Bmw Z4 sDrive30i. At this point, the Cayman GT4 leads by 1.40 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayman GT4 is doing 155 km/h against 137 km/h for the Bmw Z4 sDrive30i. The gap is 1.15 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayman GT4 crosses the line in 11.90 s versus 13.60 s. The 1.70 s gap represents roughly 78 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayman GT4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayman GT4 finishes in 21.59 s versus 24.59 s, with a 3.00 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw Z4 sDrive30i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.48 kg/hp vs 5.48 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.13 seconds. The 1.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayman GT4 981 gagne (3,95 s vs 5,35 s).
Cayman GT4 981 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,95 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayman GT4 981 : 385 hp, ratio 3,48 kg/hp. Z4 sDrive30i G29 : 258 hp, ratio 5,48 kg/hp.
Cayman GT4 981 : 295 km/h. Z4 sDrive30i G29 : 250 km/h.