Sur 0–100 km/h, Dolphin Boost 150kW gagne (6,93 s vs 7,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Dolphin Boost 150kW | ID.3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,93 s−0,42 s | 7,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,14 s−0,36 s | 15,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,66 s−0,47 s | 29,13 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,30 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,82 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Dolphin Boost 150kW | ID.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,88 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,23 s | 3,15 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,23 s | 5,31 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,93 s | 7,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,17 s | 10,01 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,56 s | 18,97 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,14 s | 15,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,66 s | 29,13 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Dolphin Boost 150kW | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Dolphin Boost 150kW hits 100 km/h in 6.93 s versus 7.35 s for the ID.3 Pro. The 0.42 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Dolphin Boost 150kW is doing 126 km/h against 121 km/h for the ID.3 Pro. The gap is 0.14 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Dolphin Boost 150kW crosses the line in 15.13 s versus 15.50 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Dolphin Boost 150kW continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Dolphin Boost 150kW finishes in 28.66 s versus 29.13 s, with a 0.47 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 160 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Dolphin Boost 150kW and the ID.3 Pro are governed to 160 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.30 kg/hp vs 8.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 0.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Dolphin Boost 150kW gagne (6,93 s vs 7,35 s).
Dolphin Boost 150kW passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,93 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Dolphin Boost 150kW : 204 hp, ratio 7,30 kg/hp. ID.3 Pro : 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp.
Dolphin Boost 150kW : 160 km/h. ID.3 Pro : 160 km/h.