Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range and ID.3 Pro are neck and neck (7,35 s vs 7,41 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Atto 3 Extended Range | ID.3 Pro | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7.41 s | 7.35 s | 0.06 s · ID.3 Pro |
| 400 m standing start | 15.57 s | 15.50 s | 0.07 s · ID.3 Pro |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.20 s | 29.13 s | 0.07 s · ID.3 Pro |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 160 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8.58 kg/hp | 8.82 kg/hp | better ratio · Atto 3 Extended Range |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Atto 3 Extended Range | ID.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.96 s | 1.88 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.27 s | 3.15 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.43 s | 5.31 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.41 s | 7.35 s · tight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.03 s | 10.01 s · tight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 19.03 s | 18.97 s · tight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 15.57 s | 15.50 s · tight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29.20 s | 29.13 s · tight gap |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro hits 100 km/h in 7.35 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro is doing 121 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 0.08 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro crosses the line in 15.50 s versus 15.57 s. The 0.07 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.06 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Atto 3 Extended Range and the ID.3 Pro are governed to 160 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.58 kg/hp vs 8.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range and ID.3 Pro are neck and neck (7,35 s vs 7,41 s, no significant gap).
Atto 3 Extended Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,41 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp. ID.3 Pro: 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp.
Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h. ID.3 Pro: 160 km/h.