Sur 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD gagne (7,76 s vs 8,18 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV 200kW 2WD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s−0,42 s | 8,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s−0,38 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s−1,59 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 211 km/h−31 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV 200kW 2WD | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,20 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,68 s | 3,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,92 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,11 s | 11,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 17,24 s | 23,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 58,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,21 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 211 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Han EV 200kW 2WD hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. Despite the faster sprint time, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is 7 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is doing 115 km/h against 123 km/h for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. The gap is 0.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Han EV 200kW 2WD crosses the line in 15.74 s versus 16.11 s. The 0.37 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Han EV 200kW 2WD finishes in 28.20 s versus 29.80 s, with a 1.60 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (211 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Han EV 200kW 2WD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.76 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 0.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Han EV 200kW 2WD gagne (7,76 s vs 8,18 s).
Han EV 200kW 2WD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,76 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Han EV 200kW 2WD : 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Han EV 200kW 2WD : 180 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 211 km/h.