Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV AWD 380kW and M3 Competition F80 are neck and neck (3,86 s vs 3,88 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Han EV AWD 380kW | M3 Competition F80 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,86 s−0,02 s | 3,88 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,05 s | 11,65 s+0,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,05 s | 20,92 s+3,13 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 250 km/h−70 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,22 kg/hp | 3,39 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Han EV AWD 380kW | M3 Competition F80 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,10 s | 1,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,94 s | 3,01 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,86 s | 3,88 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,02 s | 4,84 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,48 s | 7,51 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 11,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,05 s | 11,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,05 s | 20,92 s |
| Top speed limited | 180 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
Off the line, the Han EV AWD 380kW hits 100 km/h in 3.86 s versus 3.88 s for the M3 Competition. The instant torque of 680 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.02 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the M3 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 154 km/h for the Han EV AWD 380kW. The gap is 0.10 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the M3 Competition crosses the line in 11.64 s versus 12.05 s. The 0.40 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the M3 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 180 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M3 Competition finishes in 20.91 s versus 24.04 s, with a 3.13 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Han EV AWD 380kW is capped at 180 km/h, the M3 Competition at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.73 seconds. The 0.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Han EV AWD 380kW and M3 Competition F80 are neck and neck (3,86 s vs 3,88 s, no significant gap).
Han EV AWD 380kW goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,86 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Han EV AWD 380kW: 517 hp, ratio 4,22 kg/hp. M3 Competition F80: 510 hp, ratio 3,39 kg/hp.
Han EV AWD 380kW: 180 km/h. M3 Competition F80: 250 km/h.