Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD wins (3,77 s vs 6,73 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Seal 390 AWD | 4 Long Range RWD | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.77 s | 6.73 s | 2.96 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| 400 m standing start | 11.94 s | 14.92 s | 2.98 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.93 s | 27.24 s | 3.31 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.06 kg/hp | 7.00 kg/hp | better ratio · Seal 390 AWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Seal 390 AWD | 4 Long Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.07 s | 1.92 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.78 s | 3.21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.87 s | 5.16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.77 s | 6.73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.90 s | 8.78 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8.21 s | 15.38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.94 s | 14.92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.93 s | 27.24 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Seal 390 AWD hits 100 km/h in 3.77 s versus 6.73 s for the 4 Long Range RWD. At this point, the Seal 390 AWD leads by 2.96 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 390 AWD is doing 155 km/h against 129 km/h for the 4 Long Range RWD. The gap is 2.17 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 390 AWD crosses the line in 11.93 s versus 14.92 s. The 2.98 s gap represents roughly 124 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 390 AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 390 AWD finishes in 23.93 s versus 27.23 s, with a 3.30 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Seal 390 AWD features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 4 Long Range RWD’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Seal 390 AWD and the 4 Long Range RWD are governed to 180 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.06 kg/hp vs 7.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.07 seconds. The 2.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD wins (3,77 s vs 6,73 s).
Seal 390 AWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,77 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 390 AWD: 530 hp, ratio 4,06 kg/hp. 4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp.
Seal 390 AWD: 180 km/h. 4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h.