Over 0–100 km/h, ë-C3 FWD wins (11,07 s vs 13,48 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | ë-C3 FWD | Spring Electric 65 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 11.07 s | 13.48 s | 2.41 s · ë-C3 FWD |
| 400 m standing start | 18.19 s | 19.46 s | 1.27 s · ë-C3 FWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32.85 s | 36.80 s | 3.95 s · ë-C3 FWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 192 km/h | 125 km/h | 67 km/h · ë-C3 FWD |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 12.53 kg/hp | 15.14 kg/hp | better ratio · ë-C3 FWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | ë-C3 FWD | Spring Electric 65 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.86 s | 3.12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.79 s | 5.23 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 8.00 s | 9.27 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 11.07 s | 13.48 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 15.28 s | 19.85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 32.47 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 18.19 s | 19.46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32.85 s | 36.80 s |
| Top speed | 192 km/h | 125 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 113 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 416 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 65 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor 48 kW |
| Torque | 113 Nm | |
| Weight | 984 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ë-C3 FWD hits 100 km/h in 11.07 s versus 13.48 s for the Spring Electric 65. At this point, the ë-C3 FWD leads by 2.41 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ë-C3 FWD is doing 106 km/h against 97 km/h for the Spring Electric 65. The gap is 0.72 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ë-C3 FWD crosses the line in 18.19 s versus 19.46 s. The 1.26 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the ë-C3 FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 144 km/h versus 125 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ë-C3 FWD finishes in 32.85 s versus 36.79 s, with a 3.94 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ë-C3 FWD is capped at 135 km/h, the Spring Electric 65 at 125 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (12.53 kg/hp vs 15.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, ë-C3 FWD wins (11,07 s vs 13,48 s).
ë-C3 FWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 11,07 seconds (calibrated simulation).
ë-C3 FWD: 113 hp, ratio 12,53 kg/hp. Spring Electric 65: 65 hp, ratio 15,14 kg/hp.
ë-C3 FWD: 192 km/h. Spring Electric 65: 125 km/h.