Over 0–100 km/h, 118d xDrive F20LCI wins (8,62 s vs 9,00 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 | 118d xDrive F20LCI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 9,00 s | 8,62 s+0,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,76 s | 16,29 s+0,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,60 s−0,27 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 214 km/h+4 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,80 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 | 118d xDrive F20LCI |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,63 s | 1,80 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,42 s | 3,05 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,95 s | 5,89 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 9,00 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,79 s | 12,06 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,22 s | 23,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 41,14 s | 52,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,76 s | 16,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,60 s | 29,87 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 230 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the 118d xDrive hits 100 km/h in 8.62 s versus 9.00 s for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. At this point, the 118d xDrive leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 118d xDrive is doing 112 km/h against 118 km/h for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. The gap is 0.77 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the 118d xDrive crosses the line in 16.28 s versus 16.76 s. The 0.47 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. Past 400 metres, both rivals hit the same electronic ceiling at 210 km/h. Neither can claw back ground through top speed - the outcome hinges on the acceleration curve between 100 and 210 km/h.
At 1,000 metres, the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 finishes in 29.59 s versus 29.87 s. The 0.27 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the 118d xDrive never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.88 kg/hp vs 9.80 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.20 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 118d xDrive F20LCI wins (8,62 s vs 9,00 s).
3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 9,00 seconds (calibrated simulation).
3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 156 hp, ratio 7,88 kg/hp. 118d xDrive F20LCI: 150 hp, ratio 9,80 kg/hp.
3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 214 km/h. 118d xDrive F20LCI: 210 km/h.