Among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (8.9 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).
I · GENERATION 2020 → · CITY CAR
DSICE
DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
156 hp, 8,9 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption, 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
156hp
240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.9s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
5.5L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications DS DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 156 hp |
| Couple | 240 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.5 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,9 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,230 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 city cars, the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris (1st with 5.5 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (5th of 11 in Combined consumption)
The DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 stands against city cars
Comparison across 14 city cars marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption5e / 11
5.5 L/100
Min 7.1 L/100 · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
0–100 km/h6e / 14
8,9 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,5 s · Toyota GR Yaris
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cooper C FWD156 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW150 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
A1 Sportback 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW150 hp · 0-100 8.1 s
Clio 5 1.3 TCe 140140 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
Frequently asked questions
DS DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.