3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8Petrol

DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

Petrolcity carGENERATION I, 2020

156 hp, 8,9 s 0-100 : among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption, 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
156 hp
240 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.9 s
VMax 210 km/h
Cons.
5.5 L
/100 km
Tank
-

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Power
156 hp
Couple
240 Nm
Gearbox
Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.5 L/100 km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
8,9 s
VMax
210 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Kerb weight
1,230 kg
Cd
0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 14 city cars, the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (1st with 5.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Toyota GR Yaris (1st with 5.5 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (5th of 11 in Combined consumption)

The 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG (5.1 L/100).

Where the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 stands against city cars

Comparison across 14 city cars marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption5e / 11
5.5 L/100
Min 7.1 L/100 · MINI John Cooper Works FWDMax 5.1 L/100 · Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG
0–100 km/h6e / 14
8,9 s
Min 14,0 s · Citroen C3 PureTech 83 FWDMax 5,5 s · Toyota GR Yaris

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

Continue with the DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

The same car, from other angles.

DS 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 rank in its segment?

Among the 14 city cars 2018–2022, the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 ranks 5th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG), 6th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (8.9 s, behind the Toyota GR Yaris).

How much does the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG instead?

The Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 vs Skoda Fabia 1.0 TSI 110 7DSG duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.