Over 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD wins (7,20 s vs 7,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 | Cooper E FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,20 s+0,56 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,37 s+0,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,41 s−1,52 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+85 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,49 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 | Cooper E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,26 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,79 s | 3,28 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,98 s | 5,36 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,76 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,81 s | 9,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,84 s | 17,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,53 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,41 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Cooper E FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.20 s versus 7.76 s for the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8. The instant torque of 290 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Cooper E FWD leads by 0.56 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cooper E FWD is doing 124 km/h against 126 km/h for the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper E FWD crosses the line in 15.37 s versus 15.61 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Cooper E FWD maxes out at 160 km/h while the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 keeps accelerating towards 245 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.06 s.
Around 570 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 85 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 finishes in 27.41 s versus 28.93 s. The 1.52 s delta in favour of the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the Cooper E FWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.15 seconds. The 0.56 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD wins (7,20 s vs 7,76 s).
4 PureTech 225 EAT8 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 228 hp, ratio 6,49 kg/hp. Cooper E FWD: 184 hp, ratio 7,58 kg/hp.
4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 245 km/h. Cooper E FWD: 160 km/h.