Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | X3 xDrive30e G01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s−0,16 s | 6,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s−0,11 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,28 s+0,13 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+20 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,82 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | X3 xDrive30e G01 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,35 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 4,34 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 6,14 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 8,43 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 14,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | 25,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,38 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,28 stight gap |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 4 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 990 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 6.14 s for the Bmw X3 xDrive30e. At this point, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 leads by 0.16 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 127 km/h for the Bmw X3 xDrive30e. The gap is 0.14 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 14.38 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw X3 xDrive30e maxes out at 210 km/h while the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 keeps accelerating towards 230 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.06 s.
Around 739 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw X3 xDrive30e overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X3 xDrive30e finishes in 26.28 s versus 26.41 s. The 0.13 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw X3 xDrive30e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.23 kg/hp vs 6.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.78 seconds. The 0.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 gagne (5,98 s vs 6,14 s).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,98 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. X3 xDrive30e G01 : 292 hp, ratio 6,82 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 : 230 km/h. X3 xDrive30e G01 : 210 km/h.