Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 wins (5,98 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s−0,84 s | 6,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s−0,69 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s−0,41 s | 26,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+30 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 3,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 5,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 9,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 15,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | 25,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,82 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. At this point, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 leads by 0.84 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 14.96 s. The 0.69 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The G6 maxes out at 200 km/h while the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 keeps accelerating towards 230 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.63 s.
At 1,000 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 finishes in 26.41 s versus 26.81 s, with just 0.41 s to spare. The G6 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 200 km/h, the G6 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.23 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.49 seconds. The 0.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 wins (5,98 s vs 6,82 s).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,98 seconds (calibrated simulation).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. G6: 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h. G6: 200 km/h.