Over 0–100 km/h, 320i Sedan G20 wins (7,02 s vs 8,36 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 9 E-Tense 250 | 320i Sedan G20 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 7.02 s | 1.34 s · 320i Sedan G20 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 15.09 s | 1.13 s · 320i Sedan G20 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 27.75 s | 0.82 s · 320i Sedan G20 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 235 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.51 kg/hp | 8.13 kg/hp | better ratio · 9 E-Tense 250 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 9 E-Tense 250 | 320i Sedan G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.40 s | 1.38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.01 s | 2.42 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.47 s | 4.81 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 7.02 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.88 s | 9.80 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.12 s | 18.00 s · tight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.70 s | 33.42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 15.09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 27.75 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 235 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 495 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the 320i Sedan hits 100 km/h in 7.02 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. Despite lacking instant torque, 184 hp of power compensates. At this point, the 320i Sedan leads by 1.34 s and sits roughly 32 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 320i Sedan is doing 120 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.24 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 320i Sedan crosses the line in 15.09 s versus 16.22 s. The 1.13 s gap represents roughly 47 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows.
At 1,000 metres, the 320i Sedan finishes in 27.74 s versus 28.57 s, with just 0.82 s to spare. The 9 E-Tense 250 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 235 km/h, the 320i Sedan never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 1.34 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320i Sedan G20 wins (7,02 s vs 8,36 s).
9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. 320i Sedan G20: 184 hp, ratio 8,13 kg/hp.
9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. 320i Sedan G20: 235 km/h.