Over 0–100 km/h, 530e iPerformance G30 wins (6,16 s vs 8,36 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 9 E-Tense 250 | 530e iPerformance G30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 6.16 s | 2.20 s · 530e iPerformance G30 |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 14.35 s | 1.87 s · 530e iPerformance G30 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 26.50 s | 2.07 s · 530e iPerformance G30 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h | 233 km/h | 2 km/h · 9 E-Tense 250 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.51 kg/hp | 7.02 kg/hp | better ratio · 530e iPerformance G30 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 9 E-Tense 250 | 530e iPerformance G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.40 s | 1.28 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.01 s | 2.15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.47 s | 4.20 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.36 s | 6.16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.88 s | 8.50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.12 s | 15.52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.70 s | 29.21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.22 s | 14.35 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.57 s | 26.50 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 233 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 770 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the 530e iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 6.16 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the 530e iPerformance leads by 2.20 s and sits roughly 36 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 530e iPerformance is doing 126 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 530e iPerformance crosses the line in 14.35 s versus 16.22 s. The 1.87 s gap represents roughly 76 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 530e iPerformance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 530e iPerformance finishes in 26.50 s versus 28.57 s, with a 2.07 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 233 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 235 km/h, the 530e iPerformance never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.51 kg/hp vs 7.02 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 530e iPerformance G30 wins (6,16 s vs 8,36 s).
9 E-Tense 250 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. 530e iPerformance G30: 252 hp, ratio 7,02 kg/hp.
9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h. 530e iPerformance G30: 233 km/h.