Over 0–100 km/h, Focus ST 250 Gen3 wins (6,43 s vs 8,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Focus ST 250 Gen3 | Civic e:HEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,43 s−1,61 s | 8,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−1,38 s | 15,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,77 s−2,68 s | 28,45 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 254 km/h+74 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,49 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Focus ST 250 Gen3 | Civic e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,83 s | 2,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,06 s | 3,75 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,09 s | 6,16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,43 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,42 s | 10,57 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,56 s | 17,70 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,65 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 15,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,77 s | 28,45 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 390 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 315 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 hits 100 km/h in 6.43 s versus 8.04 s for the Civic e:HEV. At this point, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 leads by 1.61 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 is doing 134 km/h against 121 km/h for the Civic e:HEV. The gap is 0.93 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 crosses the line in 14.55 s versus 15.94 s. The 1.39 s gap represents roughly 57 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 171 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Focus ST 250 Gen3 finishes in 25.77 s versus 28.45 s, with a 2.68 s lead.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Civic e:HEV never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 7.49 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.00 seconds. The 1.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Focus ST 250 Gen3 wins (6,43 s vs 8,04 s).
Focus ST 250 Gen3 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,43 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Focus ST 250 Gen3: 250 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. Civic e:HEV: 181 hp, ratio 7,49 kg/hp.
Focus ST 250 Gen3: 254 km/h. Civic e:HEV: 180 km/h.