Among the 15 compacts hybrid 2020–2024, the Civic e:HEV ranks 4th of 13 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100, behind the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS), 3rd of 15 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw 123 xDrive).
Gen XII · GENERATION 2022 → · COMPACT
HondaHEV
Civic e:HEV
181 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 15 compacts hybrid 2020–2024, the Civic e:HEV ranks 4th of 13 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
181hp
315 Nm · 184 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.9s
VMax 180 km/h
Cons.
4.7L
/100 km
Tank
-L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Honda Civic e:HEV
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,993 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 184 hp |
| Combined power | 181 hp |
| Couple | 315 Nm |
| Gearbox | CVT 1 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.7 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,9 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,802 mm |
| Height | 1,415 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,355 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 15 compacts hybrid, the Civic e:HEV ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 4th of 13 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100), 3rd of 15 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS (1st with 4.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw 123 xDrive (1st with 6.3 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.7 L/100 L/100 (4th of 13 in Combined consumption)
The Civic e:HEV consumes 4.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS (4.4 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Civic e:HEV stands against compacts hybrid
Comparison across 15 compacts hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption4e / 13
4.7 L/100
Min 6.4 L/100 · Bmw 123 xDriveMax 4.4 L/100 · Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS
0–100 km/h3e / 15
7,9 s
Min 11,2 s · Hyundai i30 Fastback 1.0 T-GDi 48V 120 PSMax 6,3 s · Bmw 123 xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
308 Hybrid 180 e-EAT8180 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
CLA 200 4MATIC Limousine184 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
CLA 200 4MATIC Saloon184 hp · 0-100 7.9 s
CLA 200 Limousine184 hp · 0-100 8.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Civic e:HEV
Frequently asked questions
Honda Civic e:HEV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS leads in Combined consumption (4.4 L/100 vs 4.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Civic e:HEV vs Hyundai i30 1.6 CRDi 48V 136 PS duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.