Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD wins (6,04 s vs 8,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E RWD | Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s−2,25 s | 8,29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s−1,77 s | 16,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s−2,06 s | 28,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,01 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,20 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E RWD | Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,57 s | 2,32 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 3,87 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,39 s | 6,21 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 8,29 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,18 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,98 s | 18,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s | 16,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s | 28,80 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Inline-3 Turbo E-Tech (H5F 130) |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 639 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 8.29 s for the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200. The instant torque of 430 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E RWD leads by 2.25 s and sits roughly 26 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD is doing 129 km/h against 120 km/h for the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200. The gap is 1.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E RWD crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 16.16 s. The 1.77 s gap represents roughly 71 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 168 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD finishes in 26.73 s versus 28.80 s, with a 2.06 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 180 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Mustang Mach-E RWD and the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 are governed to 180 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.45 seconds. The 2.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD wins (6,04 s vs 8,29 s).
Mustang Mach-E RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Mustang Mach-E RWD: 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp. Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: 200 hp, ratio 8,20 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E RWD: 180 km/h. Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: 180 km/h.