Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Essence hybridecompact SUVGENERATION Austral, 2022

200 hp, 8,4 s 0-100 : among the 12 C-SUV hybrid 2020–2024, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 ranks 5th of 12 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 11 in Tank range, 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Power
200 hp
300 Nm, dont 68 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
8.4 s
VMax 180 km/h
Cons.
5.3 L
/100 km
Tank
55 L

Full specifications

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture
Inline · Turbo
Displacement
1 cm³
Electric power
68 hp
Combined power
200 hp
Couple
300 Nm
Gearbox
Double embrayage Automatique
Transmission
Traction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP
5.3 L/100 km
Tank
55 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h
8,4 s
VMax
180 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length
4,510 mm
Wheelbase
2,667 mm
Width
1,839 mm
Height
1,620 mm
Kerb weight
1,639 kg
Cd
0.3

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 C-SUV hybrid, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 11 in Tank range (1038 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Kia Niro HEV FWD (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X2 sDrive20d (1st with 1059 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.3 L/100 L/100 (5th of 12 in Combined consumption)

The Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 consumes 5.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Kia Niro HEV FWD (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 1038 km (2nd of 11 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 covers 1038 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1059 km.

Where the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 stands against C-SUV hybrid

Comparison across 12 C-SUV hybrid marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption5e / 12
5.3 L/100
Min 6.8 L/100 · BMW X1 xDrive25iMax 4.8 L/100 · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Tank range2e / 11
1 038 km
Min 836 km · BMW X1 sDrive20iMax 1 059 km · BMW X2 sDrive20d
0–100 km/h5e / 12
8,4 s
Min 11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWDMax 6,5 s · BMW X1 xDrive25i

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Popular duels involving the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Continue with the Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

The same car, from other angles.

Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 rank in its segment?

Among the 12 C-SUV hybrid 2020–2024, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 ranks 5th of 12 in Combined consumption (5.3 L/100, behind the Kia Niro HEV FWD), 2nd of 11 in Tank range (1038 km, behind the BMW X2 sDrive20d), 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (8.4 s, behind the BMW X1 xDrive25i).

What is the range of the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200?

1038 km on a full tank (5.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 11 in Tank range.

How much does the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 cost to run?

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Kia Niro HEV FWD instead?

The Kia Niro HEV FWD leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 5.3 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 vs Kia Niro HEV FWD duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.