Sur 0–100 km/h, Jazz e:HEV gagne (10,04 s vs 10,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Jazz e:HEV | 116i F40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 10,04 s−0,72 s | 10,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,34 s−0,31 s | 17,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,87 s−0,52 s | 32,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 175 km/h | 195 km/h−20 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,29 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Jazz e:HEV | 116i F40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,27 s | 2,05 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,89 s | 3,56 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,98 s | 7,30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 10,04 s | 10,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 14,08 s | 15,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 31,01 s | 31,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,34 s | 17,65 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,87 s | 32,39 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 118 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 109 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 180 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 340 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Jazz e:HEV hits 100 km/h in 10.04 s versus 10.76 s for the Bmw 116i. The 0.72 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Jazz e:HEV is doing 107 km/h against 103 km/h for the Bmw 116i. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Jazz e:HEV crosses the line in 17.34 s versus 17.65 s. The 0.31 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Jazz e:HEV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 146 km/h versus 143 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Jazz e:HEV finishes in 31.87 s versus 32.38 s, with a 0.52 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (195 km/h), the Bmw 116i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Jazz e:HEV is capped at 175 km/h, the Bmw 116i at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.51 kg/hp vs 12.29 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.41 seconds. The 0.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Jazz e:HEV gagne (10,04 s vs 10,76 s).
Jazz e:HEV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 10,04 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Jazz e:HEV : 118 hp, ratio 10,51 kg/hp. 116i F40 : 109 hp, ratio 12,29 kg/hp.
Jazz e:HEV : 175 km/h. 116i F40 : 195 km/h.