Among the 138 compacts 2017–2021, the 116i ranks 88th of 134 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 68th of 128 in Tank range (867 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 126th of 138 in 0–100 km/h (10.9 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).
F40 · GENERATION 2019 → · COMPACT
BMWICE
116i
109 hp, 10,9 s 0-100 : among the 138 compacts 2017–2021, the 116i ranks 88th of 134 in Combined consumption, 68th of 128 in Tank range, 126th of 138 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
109hp
180 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
10.9s
VMax 195 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 116i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm³ |
| Power | 109 hp |
| Couple | 180 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 52 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 10,9 s |
| VMax | 195 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,329 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm |
| Width | 1,765 mm |
| Height | 1,421 mm |
| Boot | 360 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,340 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 136 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 138 compacts, the 116i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (88th of 134 in Combined consumption)
The 116i consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).
Tank range: 867 km (68th of 128 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 116i covers 867 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 116i stands against compacts
Comparison across 138 compacts marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption88e / 134
6 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range68e / 128
867 km
Min 520 km · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h126e / 138
10,9 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 Wagon 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A3 Sedan116 hp · 0-100 9.9 s
A3 Sportback TFSI 85 kW116 hp · 0-100 9.7 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.4 s
A3 allstreet150 hp · 0-100 8.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 1 Series F40 range
Generation F40 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F40
Compare
Popular duels involving the 116i
Frequently asked questions
BMW 116i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
867 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 68th of 128 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 116i vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.