Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 and 520i Touring G30 are neck and neck (8,35 s vs 8,45 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | 520i Touring G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s−0,10 s | 8,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s−0,04 s | 16,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 225 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | 520i Touring G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,97 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 3,28 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 5,94 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 8,45 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 11,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 21,20 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | 40,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 16,23 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 225 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the E-PACE P200 hits 100 km/h in 8.35 s versus 8.45 s for the Bmw 520i Touring. The 0.10 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 114 km/h for the Bmw 520i Touring. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the E-PACE P200 crosses the line in 16.19 s versus 16.23 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The E-PACE P200 maxes out at 215 km/h while the Bmw 520i Touring keeps accelerating towards 225 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.05 s.
Around 986 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw 520i Touring overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 10 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 520i Touring finishes in 29.41 s versus 29.41 s. The 0.00 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Bmw 520i Touring at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.58 seconds. The 0.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 and 520i Touring G30 are neck and neck (8,35 s vs 8,45 s, no significant gap).
E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. 520i Touring G30: 184 hp, ratio 9,32 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. 520i Touring G30: 225 km/h.