Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 520i Touring ranks 14th of 23 in Combined consumption (5.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 12th of 23 in Tank range (1193 km, behind the Bmw 520d Touring), 23th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (8.3 s, behind the Bmw 540d xDrive Touring).
520i Touring
184 hp, 8,3 s 0-100 : among the 23 grand tourers hybrid 2018–2022, the 520i Touring ranks 14th of 23 in Combined consumption, 12th of 23 in Tank range, 23th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
184hp
290 Nm · 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
8.3s
VMax 225 km/h
Cons.
5.7L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Full specifications BMW 520i Touring
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,998 cm³ |
| Puissance électrique | 11 hp |
| Combined power | 184 hp |
| Couple | 290 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 68 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,3 s |
| VMax | 225 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,963 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 1,868 mm |
| Height | 1,498 mm |
| Boot | 560 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,715 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 131 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 grand tourers hybrid, the 520i Touring ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 520d Touring (1st with 1467 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.7 L/100 L/100 (14th of 23 in Combined consumption)
The 520i Touring consumes 5.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d Touring (4.5 L/100).
Tank range: 1193 km (12th of 23 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 520i Touring covers 1193 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1467 km.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the 520i Touring stands against grand tourers hybrid
Comparison across 23 grand tourers hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Popular duels involving the 520i Touring
BMW 520i Touring: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1193 km on a full tank (5.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 12th of 23 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 520d Touring leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 5.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 520i Touring vs Bmw 520d Touring duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.