Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AE-PACEvsBX4Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · X4

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs BMW X4 xDrive20i G02: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2018 · Methodology
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
BMWPetrol

X4 xDrive20i G02

184 hp · 290 Nm · 1,720 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Gap0.07 sNot a significant gap
BBMW X4 xDrive20i G02

8.28 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200X4 xDrive20i G02Gap
0–100 km/h8.35 s8.28 s0.07 s · X4 xDrive20i G02
400 m standing start16.19 s16.05 s0.14 s · X4 xDrive20i G02
1,000 m standing start29.41 s29.55 s0.14 s · E-PACE P200
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h215 km/hSame
Power-to-weight ratio8.74 kg/hp9.35 kg/hpbetter ratio · E-PACE P200

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrolX4 xDrive20i G02
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageE-PACE P200X4 xDrive20i G02
0–30 km/h1.98 s1.62 s
0–50 km/h3.33 s2.88 s
0–80 km/h5.88 s5.67 s
0–100 km/h8.35 s8.28 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h11.44 s11.72 s
0–160 km/h21.17 s22.36 s
0–200 km/h45.14 s49.26 s
400 m standing start16.19 s16.05 s · tight gap
1,000 m standing start29.41 s · tight gap29.55 s
Top speed215 km/h215 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpratio better by 0,61 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
BMW

X4 xDrive20i G02

9,35kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power184 hp4 cyl
Torque290 Nm
Weight1 720 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the X4 xDrive20i hits 100 km/h in 8.28 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the X4 xDrive20i is doing 113 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the X4 xDrive20i crosses the line in 16.05 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.14 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.14 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the E-PACE P200 and the X4 xDrive20i are governed to 215 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.35 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.81 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of E-PACE P200
Audi Q5 SUVAudi Q5 SportbackAudi Q5 SUV

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSBMW

Q5 Sportback vs X4 xDrive20i

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

AudiVSBMW

Q5 Sportback vs X4 xDrive20i

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 and X4 xDrive20i G02 are neck and neck (8,28 s vs 8,35 s, no significant gap).

E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. X4 xDrive20i G02: 184 hp, ratio 9,35 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. X4 xDrive20i G02: 215 km/h.