Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AE-PACEvsBAtecaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · Ateca

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs Cupra Ateca: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2016 · Methodology
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

VS
CupraPetrolFaster

Ateca

190 hp · 320 Nm · 1,615 kg · 2016

Result · 0–100 km/h

AJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Gap1.20 sin favour of Ateca
BCupra Ateca

7.15 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200AtecaGap
0–100 km/h8.35 s7.15 s1.20 s · Ateca
400 m standing start16.19 s15.32 s0.87 s · Ateca
1,000 m standing start29.41 s27.82 s1.59 s · Ateca
Top speed (electronically limited)215 km/h218 km/h3 km/h · Ateca
Power-to-weight ratio8.74 kg/hp8.50 kg/hpbetter ratio · Ateca

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
CupraPetrolAteca
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageE-PACE P200Ateca
0–30 km/h1.98 s1.96 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h3.33 s2.93 s
0–80 km/h5.88 s5.15 s
0–100 km/h8.35 s7.15 s
0–120 km/h11.44 s9.81 s
0–160 km/h21.17 s17.57 s
0–200 km/h45.14 s32.93 s
400 m standing start16.19 s15.32 s
1,000 m standing start29.41 s27.82 s
Top speed215 km/h218 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpcompensated by −133 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF
Cupra

Ateca

8,50kg/hpratio better by 0,24 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power190 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 615 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox7-speed DSG

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Ateca hits 100 km/h in 7.15 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Ateca leads by 1.20 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Ateca is doing 122 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.56 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Ateca crosses the line in 15.32 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.87 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Ateca continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 168 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Ateca finishes in 27.81 s versus 29.41 s, with a 1.60 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (215 vs 218 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Ateca at 218 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 8.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Ateca
BMW X1 xDrive25iAudi Q3 SUVAudi Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 SUV vs E-PACE P200

JaguarVSAudi

E-PACE P200 vs Q3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Ateca wins (7,15 s vs 8,35 s).

E-PACE P200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).

E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. Ateca: 190 hp, ratio 8,50 kg/hp.

E-PACE P200: 215 km/h. Ateca: 218 km/h.