Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,73 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne S 958.1 | F-PACE P400e | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,73 s | 5,37 s+0,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s | 13,60 s+0,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,21 s | 24,60 s+0,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 255 km/h+35 km/h | 220 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,92 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,55 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne S 958.1 | F-PACE P400e |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 1,40 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,31 s | 2,33 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,73 s | 5,37 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,71 s | 7,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,97 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,63 s | 19,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s | 13,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,21 s | 24,60 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 065 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 404 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 243 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the F-PACE P400e hits 100 km/h in 5.37 s versus 5.73 s for the Cayenne S. The instant torque of 640 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the F-PACE P400e leads by 0.36 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE P400e is doing 137 km/h against 133 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 0.19 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE P400e crosses the line in 13.60 s versus 13.92 s. The 0.32 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE P400e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE P400e finishes in 24.60 s versus 25.21 s, with a 0.61 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (255 km/h), the Cayenne S never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne S is capped at 258 km/h, the F-PACE P400e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.75 seconds. The 0.36 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,73 s).
Cayenne S 958.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne S 958.1: 420 hp, ratio 4,92 kg/hp. F-PACE P400e: 404 hp, ratio 5,55 kg/hp.
Cayenne S 958.1: 255 km/h. F-PACE P400e: 220 km/h.