Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 4,24 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE R P575 | M4 F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s−0,50 s | 4,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s−0,86 s | 12,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s−1,59 s | 22,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 300 km/h+50 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,54 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE R P575 | M4 F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,10 s | 1,14 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,99 s | 3,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,75 s | 5,70 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,30 s | 9,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,00 s | 14,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s | 12,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s | 22,29 s |
| Top speed limited | 300 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-TYPE R P575 2020 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M4 | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
Off the line, the F-TYPE R P575 hits 100 km/h in 3.74 s versus 4.24 s for the Bmw M4. At this point, the F-TYPE R P575 leads by 0.50 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 is doing 165 km/h against 151 km/h for the Bmw M4. The gap is 0.49 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE R P575 crosses the line in 11.52 s versus 12.38 s. The 0.86 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 230 km/h versus 212 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 finishes in 20.70 s versus 22.29 s, with a 1.59 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE R P575 is capped at 300 km/h, the Bmw M4 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.03 kg/hp vs 3.54 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.44 seconds. The 0.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 4,24 s).
F-TYPE R P575 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,74 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-TYPE R P575 : 575 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp. M4 F82 : 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp.
F-TYPE R P575 : 300 km/h. M4 F82 : 250 km/h.