Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 4,26 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE R P575 | 718 Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s−0,53 s | 4,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s−0,53 s | 12,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s−0,79 s | 21,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 300 km/h | 310 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,46 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE R P575 | 718 Spyder |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,10 s | 1,11 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,86 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,99 s | 3,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s | 4,26 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,75 s | 5,27 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,30 s | 8,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,00 s | 12,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s | 12,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s | 21,49 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h | 310 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-TYPE R P575 2020 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 454 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
Off the line, the F-TYPE R P575 hits 100 km/h in 3.74 s versus 4.27 s for the 718 Spyder. At this point, the F-TYPE R P575 leads by 0.53 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 is doing 165 km/h against 156 km/h for the 718 Spyder. The gap is 0.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE R P575 crosses the line in 11.52 s versus 12.04 s. The 0.52 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 230 km/h versus 224 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 finishes in 20.70 s versus 21.49 s, with a 0.79 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (300 vs 310 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 300 km/h, the F-TYPE R P575 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.03 kg/hp vs 3.46 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.82 seconds. The 0.53 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 gagne (3,74 s vs 4,26 s).
F-TYPE R P575 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,74 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-TYPE R P575 : 575 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp. 718 Spyder : 420 hp, ratio 3,46 kg/hp.
F-TYPE R P575 : 300 km/h. 718 Spyder : 310 km/h.